From 8a68a02b9d3bbc4c7ddd3691db0b578a9b665ff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabio Manganiello <fabio@manganiello.tech> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:24:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Minor fixes --- markdown/Building-a-better-digital-reading-experience.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/markdown/Building-a-better-digital-reading-experience.md b/markdown/Building-a-better-digital-reading-experience.md index 955ec2c..2a414b0 100644 --- a/markdown/Building-a-better-digital-reading-experience.md +++ b/markdown/Building-a-better-digital-reading-experience.md @@ -121,9 +121,10 @@ high-quality content available online (locking people into apps and subscriptions in order to view the content) is detrimental for the distribution of knowledge in what's supposed to be the age of information. If I want to be exposed to diverse opinions on what's going on in different industries or -different parts of the world, I'd probably need at least a dozen subscriptions, -while in earlier generations folks could just walk into their local library or -buy a single book or a single issue of a newspaper every now and then. +different parts of the world, I'd probably need at least a dozen subscriptions +and a similar number of apps on my phone, all pushing notifications, while in +earlier generations folks could just walk into their local library or buy a +single book or a single issue of a newspaper every now and then. I don't think that we should settle for a world where the best reports, the best journalism and the most insightful blog articles are locked behind