License change #379
Labels
No labels
architecture
authentication
backend
bug
ci/cd
cleanup
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
in progress
invalid
media
mobile
new feature
packaging
question
ui
voice
waiting user input
wontfix
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: platypush/platypush#379
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
s/MIT/AGPL/
See responses on this thread.
After some consideration with people who understand licenses better than myself, I've opted to keep the current MIT license - GPL would make it challenging to still keep integrations that rely on non-open dependencies in the same repo, and AGPL would make it challenging even to keep them in a separate non-free repo and then combine them and run them together as a service.
In the future I may consider an Apache License, but for now I'm happy with MIT - also because I don't care much of the patent protection schemes offered by the Apache License, as I don't believe in software patents being a useful thing anyway.