372 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
372 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
[//]: # (title: Transform a RaspberryPi into a universal Zigbee and Z-Wave bridge)
|
||
[//]: # (description: Use the Platypush Zigbee and Z-Wave integration to create a smart home bridge to rule them all.)
|
||
[//]: # (image: /img/zigbee-zwave-1.jpg)
|
||
[//]: # (author: Fabio Manganiello <fabio@platypush.tech>)
|
||
[//]: # (published: 2020-02-25)
|
||
|
||
Home automation comes with plenty of potential to make our lives easier. But in order to succeed in its task, it often
|
||
requires you to fill your house with bridges that can connect your smart devices to your Wi-Fi network. Unless you buy a
|
||
smart device that communicates directly over Wi-Fi (like
|
||
a [TP-Link](https://www.tp-link.com/nl/home-networking/smart-plug/hs100/)
|
||
or [Belkin](https://www.belkin.com/us/p/P-F7C063/) smart plug), odds are that many of your favourite smart devices use
|
||
either Bluetooth, Zigbee or Z-Wave to communicate. These protocols solve some of the issues of Wi-Fi when it comes to
|
||
smart devices — like latency, centralised topology and relatively high power requirements — but they do require some
|
||
physical hardware in between to do the smart protocol <-> Wi-Fi translation and make the devices actually controllable
|
||
from a Wi-Fi-connected client. The bad thing is that you’ll probably need a different bridge or hub for each class of
|
||
devices you want to use. Philips Hue lights come with their own bridge, same for Lutron, same for HomeKit, same for
|
||
Belkin, same for Switchbot, and the list goes on. What’s ironic is that most of these devices actually speak the same
|
||
protocol (either Zigbee or Z-Wave) but, in most of the cases, they can only control their own devices. Try to imagine an
|
||
alternative reality where all the ethernet cards can send and receive TCP/IP packets, but you’ll need an adapter just
|
||
for HTTP traffic, one for FTP, one for SMTP, and so on: that’s more or less the reality today when it comes to smart
|
||
bridges and hubs. In order to solve the problem, many companies are throwing on the market even more hubs and bridges (
|
||
from Samsung SmartThings, to the plethora of Amazon Echo, Google and Apple devices etc.), often compatible only with a
|
||
subset of the devices out there and incompatible with one another, often incompatible by design with devices produced by
|
||
competitors: that only brings even more fragmentation to the current smart home hell.
|
||
|
||
![How standards proliferate](../img/standards.png)
|
||
|
||
Moreover, many hubs can usually talk only to their smartphone app, adding an app hell to the bridge hell.
|
||
|
||
One of the most sought goals nowadays when it comes to home automation is (or it should be) to find consistent ways to
|
||
communicate with as many devices as possible using the same tool, the same box and the same interface.
|
||
|
||
I’ve recently worked on achieving this goal in platypush. Other platforms have tackled the issue too (from HASS.io to
|
||
Openhab) but, in my opinion, they all still require a certain degree of user configuration (like specifying what each
|
||
device is and what it’s supposed to do) that in my opinion shouldn’t be required. In this article, we’ll go through what
|
||
Zigbee and Z-Wave actually are, what you need to set up a universal bridge for them using just a Raspberry Pi and a USB
|
||
dongle, and how to permanently move your existing smart bridges to the storage room.
|
||
|
||
## Zigbee vs. Z-Wave
|
||
|
||
Zigbee and Z-Wave have arguably risen to become the dominant communication protocols in the smart home and IoT
|
||
industries. They share some common features, such as:
|
||
|
||
- They are better suited for low-powered devices. Wi-Fi is a relatively power-hungry protocol, needs to deal with packet
|
||
losses, relies on a centralised topology, and isn’t ideal for communication with devices that can be asleep for a long
|
||
time because of its high overhead on reconnection. Zigbee and Z-Wave have instead been designed to work well with
|
||
low-powered devices, be low-latency and optimized for sending less bytes on the network. Some Z-Wave or Zigbee devices
|
||
can theoretically run on the same battery for a couple of years; a similar Wi-Fi device won’t usually last more than a
|
||
couple of days.
|
||
|
||
- While Wi-Fi networks are usually configured using a star-based topology (one access point/router in the middle and all
|
||
the devices connect to it), Zigbee and Z-Wave have been designed to support more flexible topologies. Each device can
|
||
be both a client and a repeater on the network, each can directly connect to other devices and expand the network with
|
||
no need to introduce further routers or access points. This allows the creation of scalable *mesh* networks that can
|
||
include devices that would otherwise be out of range.
|
||
|
||
When it comes to the differences:
|
||
|
||
- **Number of devices**: Z-Wave networks are limited to 232 devices, while Zigbee supports up to 65k devices.
|
||
|
||
- **Maximum hops**: Z-Wave supports up to four hops between a device and the network controller, while Zigbee has
|
||
theoretically no such limitations.
|
||
|
||
- **Operating range**: Most Zigwave devices operate around the 2.4 GHz spectrum — although some specific devices also
|
||
use 784 MHz in China, 868 MHz in Europe and 915 MHz in the US and Australia. Z-Wave devices instead operate around the
|
||
850–900 MHz range (at 868.42 MHz in Europe, at 908.42 MHz in North America and other frequencies in other countries
|
||
depending on their regulations).
|
||
|
||
- **Signal range**: A thumb rule when it comes to electromagnetic waves is that, at fixed transmission power, the higher
|
||
the frequency the lower the range. It means that Z-Wave devices, which operate at lower frequencies, have usually a
|
||
longer range compared to Zigbee. An unobstructed Z-Wave signal can travel up to 100 meters outdoor, although a common
|
||
guideline is 30 meters indoor for unobstructed signals and 15 meters if there are walls in between. The indoor range
|
||
for Zigbee is instead usually limited around 12 meters. However, Zigbee networks theoretically support an unlimited
|
||
number of hops between the nodes and the controller, so the range can be easily extended by adding more nodes to the
|
||
network.
|
||
|
||
- **Signal reliability**: Z-Wave has a longer range than Zigbee. It means that, at a fixed distance, its signal is
|
||
usually more reliable. Moreover, Zigbee operates in the relatively “quieter” 800–900 MHz spectrum, therefore it
|
||
doesn’t have to share the crowded 2.4 GHz spectrum with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth devices. That overall leads to more
|
||
reliable communication.
|
||
|
||
- **Ownership and protocol**: Z-Wave is a proprietary technology developed and maintained by Sigma Designs. Sigma (
|
||
acquired by Silicon Labs in 2018) owns the protocol, licenses the compatible devices and runs the Z-Wave Alliance, and
|
||
grants certifications to the devices that comply with the standard. Its selling point is, in my opinion, the strong
|
||
enforcement of a shared protocol both on hardware and software side. Each sensor, configuration value or switch is
|
||
defined by a variable type, a range, a read-only vs. read-write policy and a structured representation that applies to
|
||
all the compliant devices. That makes it very easy to develop consistent interfaces that can comprehensively represent
|
||
and control any device as long as it speaks Z-Wave, even if the implementation doesn’t know exactly which device it
|
||
is. Zigbee, on the other hand, is an open standard maintained by the Zigbee Alliance. It also has a certification
|
||
process in place, but that comes in two parts — one part certifies the hardware, the other certifies the software. It
|
||
is possible to produce Zigbee certified hardware even if the software isn’t certified nor compatible with other
|
||
clients. While this makes the protocol much more open than Z-Wave, it also makes the task of writing an all-purpose
|
||
interfacing software much harder, as different devices may name their properties following different conventions.
|
||
|
||
That should cover most of the knowledge you need when it comes to the theory of Zigbee and Z-Wave. You’ll find many Zigbee and Z-Wave compatible smart devices around. Some examples of Zigbee devices are the Philips Hue and Ikea smart bulbs, Honeywell thermostats, Belkin smart plugs and bulbs, Bosch sensors and Osram products. Z-Wave includes around 65,000 compatible devices out there, including many garage doors, presence and temperature sensors, thermostats, dimmers, remote controls, smoke detectors and so on.
|
||
|
||
That should cover most of the knowledge you need when it comes to the theory of Zigbee and Z-Wave. You’ll find many
|
||
Zigbee and Z-Wave compatible smart devices around. Some examples of Zigbee devices are the Philips Hue and Ikea smart
|
||
bulbs, Honeywell thermostats, Belkin smart plugs and bulbs, Bosch sensors and Osram products. Z-Wave includes around
|
||
65,000 compatible devices out there, including many garage doors, presence and temperature sensors, thermostats,
|
||
dimmers, remote controls, smoke detectors and so on.
|
||
|
||
## Hardware and software
|
||
|
||
We’ll use a RaspberryPi in the following examples as a DIY bridge (any model and any distribution should work fine), and
|
||
Platypush as a home automation platform that also runs the Zigbee and Z-Wave integrations.
|
||
|
||
## Making your own Zigbee bridge
|
||
|
||
On the hardware side you’ll need:
|
||
|
||
- One or more Zigbee compatible devices, like Philips Hue, Ikea or Osram lights or Belkin switches.
|
||
|
||
- A Zigbee-to-USB adapter/sniffer.
|
||
The [CC2531](https://www.amazon.com/Gowoops-Protocol-Analyzer-Sniffer-802-15-4/dp/B07P5LY7Z6/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=zigbee+usb+adapter&link_code=qs&qid=1582640215&sr=8-6)
|
||
is one of the most popular options out there.
|
||
|
||
- A [Zigbee debugger+adapter cable](https://www.amazon.com/Debugger-Downloader-Programmed-Simulation-Programmer/dp/B07T13JX32/ref=pd_sbs_147_9?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B07T13JX32&pd_rd_r=d44d5902-3147-4af9-ba8a-de7d31d4d1e0&pd_rd_w=j45M7&pd_rd_wg=TNdkl&pf_rd_p=7cd8f929-4345-4bf2-a554-7d7588b3dd5f&pf_rd_r=KRHVT3D830174F7FCB05&psc=1&refRID=KRHVT3D830174F7FCB05),
|
||
that you’ll need in order to flash the firmware on the dongle.
|
||
|
||
- A RaspberryPi or similar device (any model and distribution should work fine), or any computer that you want to use as
|
||
a bridge.
|
||
|
||
On the software side:
|
||
|
||
- Platypush uses [`zigbee2mqtt`](https://www.zigbee2mqtt.io/) as a backend to interact with the Zigbee dongle. Install
|
||
the zigbee2mqtt firmware on the dongle by following the instructions (for Windows, macOS and Linux)
|
||
on [their website](https://www.zigbee2mqtt.io/getting_started/flashing_the_cc2531.html).
|
||
You can check a list of the compatible devices [here](https://www.zigbee2mqtt.io/information/supported_devices.html).
|
||
|
||
- Install, start and enable an MQTT instance on the local machine, if you don’t have a server already running in your
|
||
network. If you’re running Debian/Ubuntu/Raspbian and want to use Mosquitto, for example:
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
[sudo] apt-get install mosquitto
|
||
[sudo] systemctl start mosquitto.service
|
||
[sudo] systemctl enable mosquitto.service
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Install zigbee2mqtt:
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
[sudo] apt-get install nodejs git make g++ gcc
|
||
git clone https://github.com/Koenkk/zigbee2mqtt
|
||
cd zigbee2mqtt
|
||
npm install
|
||
|
||
# Change mqtt.server and serial.port to respectively
|
||
# match your MQTT server and USB dongle device.
|
||
vi data/configuration
|
||
|
||
npm start
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
You can also make a systemd service out of it:
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
[Unit]
|
||
Description=zigbee2mqtt
|
||
After=network.target
|
||
|
||
[Service]
|
||
ExecStart=/usr/bin/npm start
|
||
WorkingDirectory=/path/to/zigbee2mqtt
|
||
StandardOutput=inherit
|
||
StandardError=inherit
|
||
Restart=always
|
||
|
||
[Install]
|
||
WantedBy=multi-user.target
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Note that the zigbee2mqtt configuration file also includes a `permit_join` option. Set this to true while you’re
|
||
pairing your Zigbee devices for the first time, and set it to false afterwards to prevent other devices from
|
||
accidentally or malignantly join the network — you can always temporarily allow joins later.
|
||
|
||
- Once started and in `permit_join` mode, you can start pairing Zigbee devices to your new network. That is usually done
|
||
by doing a factory reset of the device. The procedure varies with the device: Philips Hue bulbs, for example, can be
|
||
reset either from the app (if they are paired to a bridge) or by pressing the ON/OFF buttons of a Hue dimmer
|
||
simultaneously for 10 seconds while keeping the dimmer within 10 cm from the lightbulb. Other Zigbee devices may
|
||
include a reset button instead.
|
||
|
||
- Once a Zigbee device joins the network, the zigbee2mqtt logs should show a trace like the following:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Successfully interviewed '0x00158d0001dc126a', device has successfully been paired
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Install Redis and Platypush with the Zigbee, HTTP and MQTT extensions:
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
[sudo] apt-get install redis-server
|
||
[sudo] systemctl start redis.service
|
||
[sudo] systemctl enable redis.service
|
||
pip install 'platypush[zigbee,http,mqtt]'
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Edit your `~/.config/platypush/config.yaml` file to enable the Zigbee and HTTP services:
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
backend.http:
|
||
port: 8008
|
||
|
||
zigbee.mqtt:
|
||
host: localhost
|
||
|
||
backend.zigbee.mqtt:
|
||
enabled: true
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Start Platypush (either by running `platypush` or starting the `platypush.service` systemd service).
|
||
|
||
- Open `http://your-raspberry:8008/` in a browser. The web panel should include the Zigbee icon in the navigation bar,
|
||
you’ll be able to control your network from there.
|
||
|
||
![Zigbee plugin screenshot 1](../img/zigbee-zwave-2.png)
|
||
|
||
![Zigbee plugin screenshot 2](../img/zigbee-zwave-3.png)
|
||
|
||
You can send requests through
|
||
the [supported API](https://docs.platypush.tech/en/latest/platypush/plugins/zigbee.mqtt.html) over HTTP, Python
|
||
code or through whichever platypush backend you have configured:
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
# HTTP request
|
||
curl -XPOST \
|
||
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PP_TOKEN" \
|
||
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '
|
||
{
|
||
"type":"request",
|
||
"action":"zigbee.mqtt.device_set",
|
||
"args": {
|
||
"device":"White Bulb",
|
||
"property":"state",
|
||
"value":"ON"}
|
||
}' http://localhost:8008/execute
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Python API
|
||
from platypush.context import get_plugin
|
||
|
||
get_plugin('zigbee.mqtt').device_set(device='White Bulb', property='state', value='ON')
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Or hook any custom logic to the [supported events](https://docs.platypush.tech/en/latest/platypush/events/zigbee.mqtt.html):
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
from platypush.event.hook import hook
|
||
from platypush.utils import run
|
||
|
||
from platypush.message.event.zigbee.mqtt import ZigbeeMqttDevicePropertySetEvent
|
||
|
||
@hook(ZigbeeMqttDevicePropertySetEvent, device='White Bulb')
|
||
def on_white_bulb_on(event, **context):
|
||
if event.properties.get('state') == 'ON':
|
||
run('tts.say', text='The light went on')
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Congratulations, you’re now ready to use your Zigbee devices and build automation without bridges!
|
||
|
||
## Making your own Z-Wave bridge
|
||
|
||
Making a DIY Z-Wave bridge is even simpler than making a Zigbee bridge, as you won’t need a debugger to flash a custom
|
||
firmware, nor an MQTT service in between.
|
||
|
||
- You’ll need a Z-Wave USB adapter dongle. I use
|
||
[this one](https://www.amazon.com/Z-Wave-Me-Smart-Stick-Cloud2-Z-Wave/dp/B00VKEH1BQ/ref=sr_1_9?keywords=z-wave+usb&qid=1582658700&sr=8-9),
|
||
but any compatible dongle should work. Take note of where the adapter is mapped on your system — e.g. `/dev/ttyUSB0`.
|
||
|
||
- Install Redis and Platypush with the Z-Wave and HTTP extensions:
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
[sudo] apt-get install redis-server
|
||
[sudo] systemctl start redis.service
|
||
[sudo] systemctl enable redis.service
|
||
[sudo] pip install 'platypush[zwave,http]'
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Configure your integrations in `~/.config/platypush/config.yaml`:
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
backend.http:
|
||
port: 8008
|
||
|
||
zwave:
|
||
device: /dev/ttyUSB0
|
||
|
||
backend.zwave:
|
||
enabled: true
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
- Start Platypush (by running `platypush` or through a systemd service) and point your browser
|
||
to `http://your-raspberry:8008/`. You’ll see a new tab for the Z-Wave integration.
|
||
|
||
![Z-Wave plugin screenshot 1](../img/zigbee-zwave-4.png)
|
||
![Z-Wave plugin screenshot 2](../img/zigbee-zwave-5.png)
|
||
![Z-Wave plugin screenshot 3](../img/zigbee-zwave-6.png)
|
||
|
||
Each Z-Wave compatible device has its own way of pairing to a network. All you need to do is to press on the `+` button
|
||
to put the network in pairing mode and then pair your devices within one minute through the procedure referred in the
|
||
user manual. Since Z-Wave has a stricter protocol and all the compliant devices publish their values using the same
|
||
format, the Z-Wave interface is much more granular and detailed compared to Zigbee.
|
||
|
||
You can, of course, send commands to the new network through
|
||
the [available API](https://docs.platypush.tech/en/latest/platypush/plugins/zwave.html) and subscribe custom hooks
|
||
on [Z-Wave events](https://docs.platypush.tech/en/latest/platypush/events/zwave.html):
|
||
|
||
```shell
|
||
# HTTP request
|
||
curl -XPOST \
|
||
-H "Authorization: Bearer $PP_TOKEN" \
|
||
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '
|
||
{
|
||
"type":"request",
|
||
"action":"zwave.get_value",
|
||
"args": {
|
||
"value_label":"Temperature",
|
||
"node_name":"Kitchen Sensor"
|
||
}
|
||
}' http://localhost:8008/execute
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Python usage
|
||
from platypush.context import get_plugin
|
||
|
||
get_plugin('zwave').get_value(value_label='Temperature', node_name='Kitchen Sensor')
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Example output
|
||
{
|
||
"type": "response",
|
||
"target": "http",
|
||
"response": {
|
||
"errors": [],
|
||
"output": {
|
||
"command_class": 49,
|
||
"data": 26.799999237060547,
|
||
"data_items": "Read only",
|
||
"genre": "User",
|
||
"index": 1,
|
||
"is_read_only": True,
|
||
"is_write_only": False,
|
||
"label": "Temperature",
|
||
"node_id": 3,
|
||
"type": "Decimal",
|
||
"units": "C",
|
||
"value_id": 72057594093256722
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# Event hook example
|
||
from platypush.event.hook import hook
|
||
from platypush.utils import run
|
||
|
||
from platypush.message.event.zwave import ZwaveValueChangedEvent
|
||
|
||
@hook(ZwaveValueChangedEvent)
|
||
def on_white_bulb_on(event, **context):
|
||
if event.node['name'] == 'Motion Sensor' and \
|
||
event.value['label'] == 'Sensor' and \
|
||
event.value['data'] is True:
|
||
run('tts.say', text='Motion has been detected')
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
You should now have all the ingredients to build your custom IoT networks and ditch those bridges for good!
|